[ВХОД]

Главная | Содержание | Форум | Файлы | Поиск | Контакт
NAVIG
О форуме
Резонансные генераторы
Магнитные генераторы
Механические центробежные (вихревые) генераторы
Торсионные генераторы
Электростатические генераторы
Водородные генераторы
Ветро- и гидро- и солнечные генераторы
Струйные технологии
Торнадо и смерчи
Экономия топлива
Транспорт
Гравитация и антигравитация
Оружие
Нейтронная физика
Научные идеи, теории, предположения...
Прочие идеи (разные)
Новые технологии
Коммерческие вопросы
Барахолка
Патентный отдел
Сделай сам. Советы.
Конструкторское бюро
мобильная версия
Печатать страницу
Поделиться...

Яндекс.Директ
Форум - Магнитные генераторы - Генератор Хаббарда - Испытания генератора Хаббарда - Стр.46
<][ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ][>
Модератор: Gecko
Post:#108 Date:08.04.2004 (18:49) ...
Насчет отрицательных результатов - могу вас порадовать, я лично пробовал собрать генератор Хаббарда( Если кому-то интересно могу рассказать, что я брал, сколько витков мотал, в общем все числовые данные на эту тему. Для неверующих могу прислать фотку, он у меня еще где-то лежит smile ), так вот, он успешно не работает. Второй конденсатор для резонанса я не ставил, мне и так стало ясно, что не выйдет. Может, конечно, я что-то не так собрал, или материалы у меня не те были (сердечники, к примеру, надо какие-то особые или еще чего), не работает он у меня, и все тут !
Вам бы на форуме надо добавить раздел теоретических рассуждений,
для обсуждения общих принципов работы всех этих сверьединичных устройств, а так же принципов, из-за которых они не работают
Danbil | Post: 110814 - Date: 12.04.08(09:03)
Админ удали все мои пустые сообщения и это в том числе!

- Правка 12.04.08(19:15) - Danbil
s_chechel | Post: 110893 - Date: 12.04.08(21:43)
А Вы всю эту ветку читали.Такая идея обсуждалась.

Я еще от своей идеи неотказался.
5, 10 и 20 кГц. Это были рекомендованные частоты Хаббардом.
А Danbil всего не рассказал. Его как всегда заклевали на форуме на ровном месте, так никто и не поняв. То что здесь всегда и поисходит. Насколько я понял, почти, фишка была не в банальной схеме, которую можно было читать двояко, а в тексете, что он писал. Но увы, так никто и недослушал.

- Правка 12.04.08(21:44) - s_chechel
yurec | Post: 110894 - Date: 12.04.08(22:20)
Danbil Пост: 110814 От 12.Apr.2008 (09:03)
Админ удали все мои пустые сообщения и это в том числе!

Зачем так быстро сдался?...

_________________
Не позволяйте обманывать себя.
queet | Post: 110895 - Date: 12.04.08(22:23)
Danbil Пост: 110814 От 12.Apr.2008 (09:03)
Админ удали все мои пустые сообщения и это в том числе!

Ну вот. Теперя мы никогда не узнаем как работает тр.р Хаббарда

_________________
http://TheWeeklyJob.com/?id=249985
Metronom | Post: 111136 - Date: 14.04.08(16:54)
Sergh Пост: 110795

Кстати, в каждом ноутбуке или ЖКИ мониторе стоит подобный, только миниатюрный преобразователь, 12 В-2 киловольта.


А для чего он, нужен в ЖКИ ????можно узнать??

_________________
** АДНАЗНАЧНА!
Vladimir | Post: 111506 - Date: 17.04.08(15:41)
Metronom Пост: 111136 От 14.Apr.2008 (16:54)
А для чего он, нужен в ЖКИ ????можно узнать??

А для питания газонаполненных ламп подсвета ТФТ матрицы!

- Правка 17.04.08(15:42) - Vladimir
Ganzha | Post: 112421 - Date: 24.04.08(16:37)
Извините за наивность - но в описаниях сказано что в конструкции ничего
не вращалось и нее двигалось - как тогда приводился в движение механический прерыватель - трамблер да еще со страшной скоростью? и нигде не сказанно о двух обмотках, везде говорится о радио активных наполнителях (сердечники) я не думаю что радиоактивные материалы продавались в аптеках в 1919 году, может действительно там стояли природные магниты?

Vladimir | Post: 112436 - Date: 24.04.08(18:37)
Ganzha Пост: 112421 От 24.Apr.2008 (16:37)
.. сказано что в конструкции ничего
не вращалось и нее двигалось - как тогда приводился в движение механический прерыватель - трамблер да еще со страшной скоростью? ...

Плохо читал. В описании проскакивает двигатель постоянного тока 3600 об.мин. Вот он-то трамблёр и крутит. Тиристоров тогда не было.

Ganzha | Post: 112448 - Date: 24.04.08(19:58)
Тогда ладно, поставим тиристоры конечно, тогда получается они попарно включаются? и на них идет импульс тока или все же думаете что были высокочастотные обмотки? Охота собрать, поделитесь если у кого что получилось

Ganzha | Post: 112478 - Date: 24.04.08(23:17)
Жалко Вас всех орогчать...но Хаббард применял радиоактивный материал - радий вот патент

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

<0001> This application corresponds to, and claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. .sctn.119(e), of U.S. Provisional application No. 60/697,729, filed on Jul. 8, 2005, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD

<0002> This disclosure introduces a technical field in which practical electrical energy is created in accordance with the overlooked exception to the energy-conservation rule that Herman von Helmholtz described in his 1847 doctrine on energy conservation: "If . . . bodies possess forces which depend upon time and velocity, or which act in directions other than lines which unite each pair of material points, . . . then combinations of such bodies are possible in which force may be either lost or gained ad infinitum." A transverse inductive force qualifies for Helmholtz's ad infinitum rule, but this force is not sufficient of itself to cause a greater energy output than input when applied to electrons of normal mass due to their unique charge-to-mass ratio. However, the increased acceleration of conduction electrons of less-than-normal inertial mass, as occurs in photoconductors, doped semiconductors, and superconductors, is proportional to the normal electron mass divided by the low electron mass, and the magnification of harnessable inductive energy is proportional to the greater relative acceleration, squared.

BACKGROUND

<0003> Magnetic force also satisfies Helmholtz's exemption to the energy-conservation rule because magnetic force is transverse to the force that causes it, and magnetic force is determined by the "relative velocity" (i.e., perpendicular to the connecting line) between electric charges. Magnification of magnetic force and energy was demonstrated by E. Leimer (1915) in the coil of a speaker phone and in the coil of a galvanometer when he irradiated a radio antenna-wire with radium. A 10-milligram, linear radium source produced a measured 2.6-fold increase in electrical current in the antenna-wire in comparing inaudible radio reception without radium to audible reception with radium. This represented a (2.6).sup.2=7.times. increase in electrical energy flowing through the respective wire coils. The possibility of this enhanced reception being attributed to a person's body holding the unit of radium to the wire was eliminated by Leimer's additional observation that, whenever the orientation of the small radium unit was changed to approximately 30 degrees relative to the wire, the energy enhancement ceased.

<0004> Applicant has deduced that Leimer's energy magnification most likely was due to low-mass electrons that were liberated and made conductive in the antenna by alpha radiation, which allowed these special electrons to be given a greater-than-normal acceleration by the received radio-broadcast photons. Applicant has further deduced that such low-mass electrons must have originated in a thin-film coating of cupric oxide (CuO) on the antenna wire. CuO is a dull-black, polycrystalline, semiconducting compound that develops in situ on copper and bronze wire in the course of annealing the wire in the presence of air. Such CuO coatings have been observed by Applicant on historical laboratory wire at the Science Museum at Oxford University, U.K., and on copper house wire of that era in the U.S., indicating that CuO coatings were commonplace. In later years, annealing has taken place under conditions that prevent most oxidation. This is followed by acid treatment to remove any remaining oxides, leaving shiny wire.

<0005> The same year that the English translation of Leimer's paper appeared in Scientific American, 16-year old Alfred M. Hubbard of Seattle, Wash., reportedly invented a fuelless generator, which he later admitted employed radium. Applicant interprets this as implying that Leimer's energy-magnification was utilized by Hubbard with feedback to make it self-sustaining. Three years later Hubbard publicly demonstrated a relatively advanced fuelless generator that illuminated a 20-watt incandescent bulb (Anon. 1919a). A reputable physics professor from Seattle College, who was intimately familiar with Hubbard's device (but not at liberty to disclose its construction details), vouched for the integrity of the fuelless generator and declared that it was not a storage device, but he did not know why it worked (Anon. 1919b). Because Hubbard initially had no financial means of his own, it is likely the professor had provided Hubbard with the use of the expensive radium initially and thereby witnessed the inventing process in his own laboratory.

<0006> Newspaper photos (Anon. 1920a) of a more impressive demonstration of Hubbard's fuelless generator show a device described as 14 inches (36 cm) long and 11 inches (28 cm) in diameter connected by four heavy electrical cables to a 35-horsepower (26 kW) electric motor. The motor reportedly propelled an 18-foot open launch around a lake at a speed of 8 to 10 knots (Anon. 1920b). The event was witnessed by a cautious news reporter who claims to have checked thoroughly for any wires that might have been connected to hidden batteries by lifting the device and motor from the boat. Radioactive-decay energy can be eliminated as the main power source because about 10.sup.8 times more radium than the entire world's supply would have been needed to equal Hubbard's reported electric energy output of 330 amperes and 124 volts.

<0007> Lester J. Hendershot of Pittsburgh, Pa., reportedly demonstrated a fuelless generator in 1928 that was claimed by Hubbard to be a copy of his own device (1928h). The president of Stout Air Services, William B. Stout, who also designed the Ford Trimotor airplane, reported (1928b): "The demonstration was very impressive. It was actually uncanny . . . . The small model appeared to operate exactly as Hendershot explained it did." Also reportedly attesting to the operability of Hendershot's fuelless generator were Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh and Major Thomas Lanphier of the U.S. Air Corps (1928a, et seq.), and Lanphier's troops reportedly assembled a working model of the device.

<0008> To the Applicant's best knowledge, the only depiction that was made public of the interior components of any of these reported generators consists of a sketchy drawing (Bermann 1928h) of Hubbard's apparatus similar in size to the device shown in his 1919 demonstration. It depicts a complex set of parallel coils measuring 6 inches (15 cm) in length and 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) overall in diameter. Four leads of insulated wire with the insulation peeled back are shown coming out of the end of the device. What those four wires were connected to internally was not shown. Hubbard's description of the internal arrangement of coils in the device generally matches the drawing (Anon. 1920a): "It is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding." Nothing was reported or depicted about how components functioned with each other, or how much radium was used and where the radium was positioned. The only connectors visible on the drawing were between the outer windings of the eight electromagnet coils. Theses connectors show that the direction of the windings alternated between clockwise and counterclockwise on adjacent coils, so that the polarity of each electromagnet would have been opposite to that of its adjacent neighbors.

<0009> If the Hubbard and Hendershot devices actually operated as reported, they apparently never attained acceptance or commercial success. Assuming the devices actually worked, their lack of success may have largely been financially based or supply-based, or both, compounded with skepticism from believers in the universal energy-conservation doctrine. How much radium was employed by Hubbard in his larger generator can only be guessed at, but assuming a typical laboratory radium needle containing 10 milligrams of radium was used, this amount would have cost $900 in 1920, dropping to $500 in 1929. That much radium in a fuelless generator would have cost as much as an inexpensive automobile in the 1920s. Possibly much more radium was used than 10 milligrams.

<0010> In 1922, when the Radium Company of America of Pittsburgh, Pa., reportedly discontinued its work with Hubbard on his invention (1928h), the entire world's supply of radium was only about 250 grams. With the extreme assumption that only 1 milligram of radium was needed per generator, less than 10 percent of a single year's production of autos in the U.S. in the mid-1920s could have been supplied with such generators. Apparently Hendershot had tried to revive the technology by showing that the fuelless generator could extend the range of air flight indefinitely, but his technology never attracted a sponsor from any private, public or philanthropic entity.

<0011> U.S. Pat. No. 4,835,433 to Brown superficially resembles the drawing of Hubbard's device. Brown's device appears to have the same number and essentially the same general arrangement of wire coils as Hubbard's generator, as nearly as can be understood from the newspaper articles depicting that device. Apparently no information concerning either the Hubbard or Hendershot devices was considered during prosecution of the '433 patent. Brown discusses the conversion of energy of radioactive decay products, principally alpha emissions, to electrical energy by amplifying electrical oscillations in a high-Q L-C circuit irradiated by radioactive materials. "During the absorption process, each alpha particle will collide with one or more atoms in the conductor knocking electrons from their orbits and imparting some kinetic energy to the electrons in the conductor thereby increasing its conductivity." (Col. 3, line 68 to col. 4, line 5.) No claim was made by Brown that the device employed a semiconductor or photoconductor that could have provided low-mass electrons for energy magnification.

<0012> Brown claimed an output of 23 amps at 400 volts, which is vastly greater than all the decay-energy represented by his reported radioactive content of 1 milligram of radium that was surrounded by weakly radioactive uranium rods and thorium powder. Powdered thorium is highly pyrophoric, so it is typically sealed in a nitrogen atmosphere to prevent spontaneous combustion. In his device Brown reportedly confined the thorium in cardboard without any mention of sealing out air. This condition would have invited a meltdown that could have been misinterpreted as massive out-of-control electrical production.

<0013> To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, and as noted, none of the devices summarized above ever was commercially accepted or exploited for any of various possible reasons. To the Applicant's best knowledge, no person other than the Applicant has ever indicated that the presence of cupric oxide on their wires could have provided energy magnification. If Hubbard's device actually did work, certain characteristics of its design are unexplainable by the Applicant, namely the use of four rather than two large electrical cables to connect his device to an electric motor, and the use of alternating polarity instead of single-direction polarity in the orientation of the multiple coils surrounding a central coil. Applicant therefore believes that the specification herein sets forth original configurations of electrical-energy generators that have no known precedent.

SUMMARY

<0014> To address the needs for electrical generators that are capable of self-generating substantial amounts of electrical power in various environments, and that are portable as well as stationary, apparatus and methods are provided for magnifying an electrical input, and (with feedback) for generating usable electrical power indefinitely without fuel or other external energy source except for starting. The apparatus utilize electrons of low effective mass, which receive greater acceleration than normal electrons in an amount that is inversely proportional to the effective mass. Applicant has determined that effective mass is the same as the electron's true inertial mass. The photon energy that is radiated when an electron is accelerated is proportional the square of the acceleration, so the increase in radiated photon energy from an accelerated low-mass electron over the energy from a normal electron is equal to the inverse square of the effective mass. E.g., the calculated energy magnification provided by photoconducting electrons in cadmium selenide, with an electron effective mass of 0.13, is 59.times.. The use of a transverse force, that lacks a direct back-force, to accelerate low-mass electrons in an oscillating manner circumvents any equal-and-opposite force that would invoke the application of the energy-conservation law of kinetics and thermodynamics.

<0015> The various embodiments of the apparatus, which are configured either to magnify continuously an input of oscillating electric energy, or to serve as a self-sustaining electric generator, employ three principal components: at least one sending coil; at least one energy-magnifying coil comprising a material that produces, in a "condition," low-mass electrons; and at least one output coil. The apparatus desirably also includes means for establishing the condition with respect to the energy-magnifying coil(s). Except where otherwise indicated in the remainder of this text, where the number of coils of a particular type is referred to in the singular, it will be understood that a plurality of coils of the respective type alternatively can be utilized.

<0016> Electrical oscillation in the sending coil, which is comprised of a metallic conductor, causes radiation of inductive photons from the sending coil. The energy-magnifying coil is situated relative to the sending coil to receive inductive photons from the sending coil. The inductive photons radiating from electrical oscillations in the sending coil convey a transverse force to the low-mass electrons in the energy-magnifying coil with no direct back-force on the sending coil. The greater-than-normal accelerations that are produced in the low-mass electrons of the energy-magnifying coil produce greater irradiation energy of inductive photons than normal.

<0017> The output coil is situated to receive the magnified inductive-photon energy from the energy-magnifying coil. The inductive-photon energy received by the output coil, which is comprised of a metallic conductor, is converted into an oscillating electrical current of normal electrons. In order for the electrical output to exceed the electrical input, the output coil is situated in such a manner that it receives more of the magnified inductive-photon energy than that which is directed back against the sending coil to act as a back-force. This "energy leverage" causes the electrical energy output to exceed the input.

<0018> By way of example, the energy-magnifying coil can comprise a superconducting material, wherein the "condition" is a temperature (e.g., a cryogenic temperature) at which the superconducting material exhibits superconducting behavior characterized by production of low-mass electrons. By way of another example, the energy-magnifying coil can comprise a photoconductive material, wherein the "condition" is a situation in which the photoconductive material is illuminated by a wavelength of photon radiation sufficient to cause the photoconductive material of the energy-magnifying coil to produce conduction electrons having low effective mass. In this latter example, the means for establishing the condition can comprise a photoconduction exciter (e.g., one or more LEDs) situated and configured to illuminate the photoconductive material of the energy-magnifying coil with the wavelength of photon radiation. By way of yet another example, the "condition" is the presence of a particular dopant in a semiconductor that provides a low-mass electron as a charge carrier. Also by way of example, the energy-magnifying coil can comprise a semiconductive element or compound that has been doped with a particular element or compound that makes it conductive of low-mass electrons without illumination by photon radiation other than by ambient photons.

<0019> Various apparatus embodiments comprise different respective numbers and arrangements of the principal components. The various embodiments additionally can comprise one or more of circuitry, energizers, shielding, and other components to fulfill the object of providing a self-sustaining source of electrical power for useful purposes.

<0020> Also provided are methods for generating an electrical current. In an embodiment of such a method a first coil is energized with an electrical oscillation sufficient to cause the first coil to radiate inductive photons. At least some of the radiated inductive photons from the first coil, called a sending coil, are received by a second coil, called the energy-magnifying coil, comprising a material that produces low-mass electrons. The received inductive photons impart respective transverse forces to the low-mass electrons that cause the low-mass electrons to experience accelerations in the material that are greater than accelerations that otherwise would be experienced by normal free electrons experiencing the transverse forces. Conduction of the accelerated low-mass electrons in the second coil causes the second coil to produce a magnified inductive force. The magnified inductive force is received by a third coil so as to cause the third coil to produce an oscillating electrical output of normal conduction electrons that has greater energy than the initial oscillation. A portion of the oscillating electrical output is directed as feed-back from the third coil to the sending coil so as to provide the electrical oscillation to the sending coil. This portion of the oscillating electrical current directed to the sending coil desirably is sufficient to cause self-sustaining generation of inductive photons by the first coil without an external energy source. The surplus oscillating electrical output from the third coil can be directed to a work loop.

MSN | Post: 112489 - Date: 25.04.08(01:03)
Ганжа, а вы читаете то что выкладываете и потом комментируете?

...it is likely the professor had provided Hubbard with the use of the expensive radium initially and thereby witnessed the inventing process in his own laboratory


...вероятно профессор предоставил Хаббарду изначально в пользование дорогостоящий радий и таким образом засвидетельствовал процесс изобретения в его собственной лаборатории


_________________
Говорите говорите, я всегда зеваю когда мне интересно. 99,9% всех СЕ устройств, - от неправильных измерений
Igor_v | Post: 112496 - Date: 25.04.08(07:05)
Ganzha не говори чушь, про то что там был радиоактивный материал было только предположение!

Ganzha | Post: 112502 - Date: 25.04.08(09:37)
Эта чушь заявлена в патенте, это не я говорю

Ganzha | Post: 112504 - Date: 25.04.08(09:42)
Hubbard кстати запантеовал свечи зажигания вот может пригодиться

US Patent # 1,723,422
Internal Combustion Engine Spark Plug
(August 6, 1929)

Alfred M. Hubbard
Assignor to Radium Spark Plug Corporation

My invention relates to the art of spark plugs. More particularly, my invention relates to a spark plug the terminals of which, that are disposed within the cylinder of an internal combustion engine, are provided with radium for ionizing the space between said terminals.

While I will describe my invention as applied to spark plugs for use in internal combustion engines, nevertheless, it is to be expressly understood that my invention is not to be construed as limited to such specific application, but is applicable to all uses where like conditions and like problems obtain.

Spark plugs, as heretofore designed for use in automobiles, are provided with a gap between the terminals of approximately one-thirty-second of an inch (1/32"). The aim of automobile engineers is to provide as great a gap as possible, in order to provide as prolonged an exposure of the fuel to the ignition spark as possible. However, the length of this exposure to the ignition means is definitely limited by the factors obtaining in the timing mechanism. If too large an amperage is employed, the breaker points in the timing mechanism are burned off. Therefore, it has been found that a compromise in the time during which the fuel may be exposed to the ignition spark and the ability of said breaker points to support the current is necessary, and, as a result, the gap between the terminals of the ordinary spark plug, as used in automobile engines, has been established as about 1-32nd of an inch. A primary object of my invention is to extend the period of exposure of the fuel to the ignition spark, and at the same time take into due consideration the weakness or limitations imposed by the breaker points of the timing mechanism.

A further difficulty that obtains in the ignition of fuel in internal combustion engines, by means of spark plugs of present practice design, resides in the fact that while under compression the spaced relation is limited to about 1-32nd of an inch., the same spark would jump a gap of some ten times the said space when exposed to pressures no greater than atmospheric pressure. In other words, it seems that subjecting the fuel gases to compression, as obtains in the ordinary internal combustion engine as used in automobiles, greatly reduces the space that may be provided between the terminals. That is, in the ordinary internal combustion engine, the necessity of compressing the fuel gases militates against providing the best condition for providing the ignition spark with spark plugs of ordinary practice design; that is, the said compression militates against providing a spark which will ignite any other than the more volatile parts of the fuel. A primary object of my invention is to provide a spark plug which overcomes this objection.

A further primary object of my invention is to provide a spark plug which will reduce the period of combustion of the fuel charge of the internal combustion engine, by providing an ignition means of a higher degree of heat.

The above-mentioned general objects of my invention, together with others inherent in the same, are attained by the device illustrated in the following drawings, the same being merely preferred exemplary forms of embodiment of my invention, throughout which drawings lie reference numerals indicate like parts:

Figure 1 is a preferred form, in side elevation, of a spark plug embodying my invention, having its terminals provided with radioactive matters;

Figure 2 is a view of such a spark plug, having the radioactive matter disposed in a pocket within the end portion of the terminals;

Figure 3 is a fragmentary view of such a spark plug having the radioactive matter applied to the end portions of the terminals; and

Figure 4 is a view of still another modified form embodying my invention, where the spark plug has but one terminal and the engine piston constitutes the other terminal for the ignition means.

In constructing a spark plug embodying my invention, preferably one or both of the terminals 5 and 6 are provided with radioactive matter 7 such as, for example, radium zinc sulphite. Preferably, one terminal 5, which is the positive terminal, is provided with said radioactive matter. These terminals, it will be noted, are in spaced relation, -- the space 8 is provided between the same. The dotted lone 9 indicates the relative position of the terminal of the present practice design of spark plug for use in automobile internal combustion engines. The radioactive matter is disposed throughout the material constituting the terminal in the preferred form shown in Figure 1.

The providing of such a terminal may be accomplished by heating the material constituting the said terminal to a very high degree of temperature in an electric furnace, and then when the molecules of said terminal material are in expanded form, the same may be dipped in radioactive matter, thereby impregnating the terminal substance with the radioactive matter.

In Figure 2, the terminal may be provided with pocket 10, and this pocket supplied with radioactive matter. Then the said pocket may be closed by suitable plugging material 11.

In the modified form shown in Figure 3, the radioactive matter is applied to the end portions of the terminal by coating the same with material containing radioactive matter 7.

In the modified form shown in Figure 3, the radioactive matter is applied to the end portions of the terminal by coating the same with material containing radioactive matter 7.

In the modified form shown in Figure 4, a spark plug having but one terminal 12, which is the positive terminal, may be provided with radioactive matter, and the piston 13 itself in cylinder 14 may be employed to constitute the negative terminal. The use of the piston for such a purpose is rendered possible owing to the fact that the space between the terminals may be greatly increased as compared to the present practice design of spark plug, so that the spark may be caused to pass from the terminal 12 to the piston 13, when the said piston is at its topmost position, or as it approaches its topmost position.

The mode of operation of a spark plug embodying my invention is as follows. The radioactive matter provided on one or both of the terminals of the spark plug facilitates the current passing between said terminals by ionizing the space therebetween. Hence, instead of the short interval of 1/32" which normally obtains between the terminals of spark plugs used in automobile internal combustion engines, I provide a much greater space. Said space may be 1/4" or more. My experiments and use of the spark plug so constructed have proven that the spark thus provided is of much greater degree of brightness, and is characterized by a much greater degree of heat. Thus, I provide for a much longer exposure of the fuel to the ignition spark, so that parts of said fuel, which are of less volatility that others, may be ignited by the spark, owing to its high degree of heat, as well as the heat developed by the burning of the more volatile parts of the fuel charge. This results in providing for a more complete combustion of the fuel in a much briefer period of time than has heretofore been possible, and also the more nearly complete elimination of all the unburnt fuel left in the cylinder.

By providing for the more complete combustion, I also provide for the reduction of carbon, which results from imperfect combustion, and which is very objectionable in that it dilutes the lubricating qualities of the oil in the crank casing.

Furthermore, a distinct advantage is noted in that a leaner fuel mixture may be employed.

To secure the same amount of power due to the more complete combustion provided by my invention. In other words, an advantage results by reason of my invention in the economizing of fuel. My experiments have shown that an engine, which may be very slow to start with spark plugs as heretofore designed, operates forthwith when provided with spark plugs embodying my invention, i.e., it is not necessary to "heat up" before the engine is able to move the car.

The same principles hereinabove set forth, as respects the spark plug embodying my invention, applies to the other modified forms illustrated.

The modified form shown in Figure 4 manifestly overcomes any difficulty of the carbon collecting between the terminals, not only by the elimination of one of the terminals in the form of a small terminal wire, but the comlpeteness of the combustion reduces the amount of carbon which is developed. The necessity of providing a carefully adjusted space interval is not requisite when the said interval is ionized, and, therefore, the care and attention now required to maintain said space is eliminated.

Obviously, changes may be made in the forms, dimensions, an arrangement of the parts of my invention, without departing from the principle thereof, the above setting forth only preferred forms of embodiment.



Ganzha | Post: 112505 - Date: 25.04.08(09:44)
Здесь от тоже использовал Радий - так многие изобретатели делают - суют что нибудь одно во все свои конструкции, от радия он заболетиь вряд ли мог, наоборот!

<][ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 107 | 108 | 109 | 110 | 111 | 112 | 113 | 114 | 115 | 116 | 117 | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 165 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ][>
У Вас нет прав отвечать в этой теме.
Форум - Магнитные генераторы - Генератор Хаббарда - Испытания генератора Хаббарда - Стр 46

Главная | Содержание | Форум | Файлы | Поиск | Контакт
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Генерация страницы: 0.035 сек